Chronicle poll results: Legislating the distance demonstrators must keep from synagogues and schools
We asked our readers if they support legislation to set limits on how close demonstrators can gather near entrances to synagogues and religious schools. Here's what they said.
Last week, the Chronicle asked its readers in an online poll the following question: “Would you support legislation to set limits on how close demonstrators can gather near entrances to synagogues and religious schools?” Of the 276 people who responded, 96% said yes and 4% said no. Comments were submitted by 64 people. A few follow.
I think this is a good idea and would help with security at synagogues and provide additional protection.
The commitment to free speech does not say where the speech should take place.
We need to be very careful to not allow our very real concerns about antisemitism to be hijacked by those who want to destroy free speech in America and call it “good for the Jews.”
I would support legislation to limit how close demonstrators can get to any community service organization, including synagogues, schools of all types, churches, playgrounds, etc.
Why not? We do it for abortion clinics.
Demonstrators should not be allowed close enough to disturb, frighten, or intimidate those that are going to worship. They should absolutely not be allowed near any schools! The Constitution allows freedom of speech, but I do not believe that should include intimidation or allow it to affect freedom of religion or education.
We shouldn’t infringe on the First Amendment right to protest — regardless of our positions on the issues. But reasonable people agree there are (and should be) limits, like when speech or action present a clear and present danger, or infringe on the rights of others. Blockading or making it hard for congregants or students to enter facilities qualifies.
Yes, but it should be equally applicable to all religious houses (not only Jewish) and all schools (not only religious). Legislation like this should be compatible with the First Amendment and its modern interpretation by the courts.It is not an oxymoron to believe in the First Amendment while still wanting there to be reasonable guiderails to protect innocent worshippers/students from intimidation and threats.
It depends on the distance and degree of interference with people who want to enter. It’s fine to demonstrate but not to obstruct. I’d have to vote “maybe.”
I do not feel that it is inconsistent to honor our Bill of Rights while simultaneously protecting vulnerable populations: Evil thoughts become threatening words, which then beget violent actions. PJC
comments